Category Archives: Message From Elder George

Environmentalists express dedication, hard work (frequently under very uncomfortable and dangerous conditions), knowledge of their sphere of influence, and an ability to marshal support for their objectives. The cumulative results of their activities indicate loses on all fronts; more species of plant and animal life have been eliminated, pollution at every level has increased, and atmospheric C02 content is approaching the point of no return.

The failure to gain on any environmental front represents a microcosm of Western society’s inability to resolve issues. Whatever a persons age, what was considered bad at the time of his birth has gotten worse in his lifetime. The prison population, divorce, adultery, mental illness, and substance abuse have all increased. Academic performance, the rate of marriage, and the stability of the family have all decreased. We live in a society incapable of resolving issues of any sort. Why then should we be surprised that the environment continues to deteriorate?

The thinking that produced a problem cannot be used to resolve that problem. That is the meaning of the term, “You must be reborn.” Western thought is out of balance with nature. It is feminine and materialist and has caused the desecration of mother earth as a result of its insatiable desire to consume. God has provided for our every need, not for all of our greed.

All environmental organizations call upon the federal, state, and local government to assist them with their concerns; however, as the government takes on increasing responsibility for our private lives it needs additional revenues to support these activities. Its revenues come from taxes whether in the form of corporate, payroll, or sales taxes. In order to extend its tax base the government promotes increased production and consumption. This governmental activity diametrically opposes the goals of environmentalism, which promote conservation and learning to live with less. To expect that government will resolve environmental issues is not only ludicrous, it is oxymoronic.

In their efforts to buttress their claims concerning the alarming deterioration of Mother Earth environmentalists point to the seemingly infinite array of scientific papers that address every segment of environmental deterioration. Science has little to do with preserving the environment, and in the aggregate probably contributes more to its deterioration than to its preservation due to scientific involvement in the development of high technology products for government and industry. Indigenous peoples of all continents except Europe did not need science to tell them what was good or bad for the environment—they took what they needed from the earth—they did not exploit it. They lived in a patriarchal structure that made the family the focal point of the community, and the preservation and propagation of the species (including its spiritual development) their paramount activity. They lived in harmony with the environment and the spiritual world that controlled it.

Western thought feels that is has to tame the environment. It actually believes that it can create a better apple than God or nature did. It is completely out of tune with nature and matters spiritual.

As any environmentalist has observed, the male of the species provides the environment and means for the female to bring forth life and nurture it. The Sun provides the environment and means for Mother Earth to bring forth life and nurture it. The entire universe functions on that basis. The Chinese call this relationship the Yin and Yang from which all life flows. However, in the West editorials are written explaining why we do not need men anymore. And then we wonder why society and the environment continue to deteriorate as the high priests of science and government are called upon to come to the rescue.

I write this material for my own clarification as well as for the purpose of presenting my thoughts to others.

For some 15 years I have written and lectured about the principle of gender and how it affects the operation of the universe and our individual and collective lives as well. My book, Dear Brothers and Sisters: Gender and Its Responsibility, describes the principle of gender along with the gender characteristics that enable the propagation and preservation of all life.

In the process of disseminating my message I came to the realization that Western society represented the feminine principle and did not understand gender differences. I later realized that those who most readily understood my message consisted of non-Western immigrants and African-Americans, people who have a cultural history of extended family and the patriarchal structure necessary to maintain it.

One realization led to another, and I came to understand that the patriarchal structure permeated the entire universe. The solar system, mammals, birds, and all human societies function within some sort of patriarchal structure. Only Western man did not practice patriarchy, which is the natural expression of gender attributes necessary for the propagation and preservation of the species. Instead he delegated the care of society to the government while he pursued material interests.

In its attempt to substitute for the natural patriarchal order Western society developed and experimented with various forms of government—none of which had any long-term success. These governmental forms always developed into strong central control in an attempt to cope with the void caused by the absence of masculine authority and the chaos that would ensue.

Western society’s unsuccessful attempts at stable governments reflect its continuous efforts to substitute something man-made for the natural order of things, which it does not understand. Western society does not know how to harmonize with nature, but rather looks upon nature as a vehicle to exploit in order to satisfy its desires for material accumulation and self-gratification; it literally destroys the environment in the process of attempting to fulfill its insatiable desire to consume. Also, the unbridled expression of the feminine psyche of Western society resulted in an aristocratic way of life intolerant of other cultures, ethnicities, and religions.

The materialistic psyche of the West inhibits its ability to understand the unseen forces of life and instead focuses on what is seen; consequently it deals only with physical effects rather than unseen causes. Dealing with effects has met continual failure regarding the well-being of families, effectiveness of schools, health of the people, and safety of society.

The Chinese refer to gender differences as the Yin and Yang from which all life flows. The West attempts to run with the Yin only—the feminine principle—ignoring the masculine principle and deprecating it in all segments of the media. This ignorance has led to the greatest evil inflicted upon humankind by Western thought—the abandonment of the preparation of people for their role in the propagation and preservation of humankind. The activity of every species of life on the planet focuses on reproducing itself. Cultural practices of all societies support the activity of propagation and preservation, as do most religious tenets. Western man on the other hand turned the responsibility for the propagation and security of the populace over to the State 2,500 years ago and instead trains his children to go to school and get a job and make money. Any societal grouping that does not work diligently for its propagation and preservation sows the seeds for its own demise.

Theories and conspiracies abound concerning the cause of the gradual control of Western society by evil forces, but they all stem from the lack of interest in propagating and preserving the species. The focus on the material world has led to a destruction of all values and practices necessary for the well-being of the race, which has resulted in unlimited self-indulgence and self-aggrandizement.

People have become upset over the increased loneliness and insecurity they experience as a result of the breakdown of the family and natural tribal structure. They seek change; however, Western society cannot fix its problems—Western thought created them. The feminine political and socio-economic structure of Western society cannot imagine that it is wrong; therefore, it opposes and suppresses any attempts to make change.

Change can only come from outside of the system. It will come from men and women of all faiths, ethnicities, and races who have an understanding of the unseen and who recognize the importance of family and the patriarchal structure necessary to maintain it. Society will rebuild on the old foundations, which were the original patriarchal structures necessary for the propagation and preservation of the species. Men’s Action to Rebuild Society was formed as a vehicle to help bring about that rebuilding.

At first glance it appears that a huge challenge lies before us; however, the enemy—Western thought—is in the process of self-destruction. To survive, it is only necessary for those who understand the basis of patriarchy to begin living a life in harmony with nature. They will survive the collapse of the Western era and usher in a new age.

I will continue—through Men’s Action—to spread a spiritually based and gender oriented message that will awaken people to their inner powers and motivate them to discard Western thought and replace it with an understanding of the universal principle of gender and the natural patriarchal structure necessary for the support of family and evolvement of humankind.

The Summer 2008 newsletter of The Women’s Freedom Network contained a review of Anne R. Pierce’s, Ships Without a Shore: America’s Undernurtured Children, a scholarly work of non-fiction that pointed out the lack of nurturing America’s children receive, and the adverse effects it creates among them. I could readily identify with this subject as our message incorporates the importance of family and the proper raising of children, so I sent Ms. Pierce a supportive Email.

In preparing to bring this book to your attention I decided to check into it in further detail. The book is not readily available in New York, so I gleaned through the information that was available such as the flier and reader comments on Amazon.com. Also, the author has a website at shipswithoutashore.com, which I logged on to and read the trailers, sample pages, and listened to a 20 minute radio interview in which she describes the lack of nurturing that American children receive.

Then it hit me.

Not once in all the reviews, commentary, promotion and interviews did I come across the words man, husband, or father. This omission says more about the state of raising our children than does her entire book. Even the word family wasn’t raised except in her reference to single parent families. Ms. Pierce informs us that she has three children, but she makes no reference to their father or her husband.

Here we have the typical western scholarly approach to analyzing a problem including consultations with experts, interviews of parents and children, and the compiling of empirical data, which will then be analyzed and conclusions drawn. No action will be implemented, which is why nothing will change.

There is a conceptual, natural, gender based cause to the issues that Ms. Pierce writes about. Women are designed physically, mentally, and emotionally to nurture the race. It is up to men to provide the environment and means for that nurturing to take place. Women have been removed from the environment that would enable them to properly nurture their children. Government cannot fix the problem—it caused it.

When women stay at home to care for their children, the children will be properly nurtured. Also, in order for a woman to be a good mother it is necessary for her to be a good wife. Part of a child’s nurturing and preparation for adulthood is witnessing the relationship between their parents.

A concern of Ms. Pierce is that women do not want to give up the gains they have made. What gains? The most miserable women on the face of this earth are English speaking white women. You can quote me on that. The number one debilitating illness of the American woman is depression, and the core group consists of middle class, white, single women—especially those with children. They are the ones that promote feminism, independence and all the intellectual slop that goes along with it.

Having said the above, I have a feeling that if I read Ms. Pierce’s book I will go along with her findings, but I don’t need her book to realize the negative conditions in which children are raised; they are the natural outcome of gender ignorance.

This brings me back to The Women’s Freedom Network, an organization whose mission statement includes the following: “It celebrates the achievements women have already made, and it views women’s issues in light of a philosophy that defines women and men as individuals and not in terms of gender. It does not set different standards of excellence, morality, or justice for men and women.” There you have it—they do not know the difference between those who have testis and those who have teats—a manifestation of the colossal ignorance of European thought. Their mission statement also indicates that they “seek alternatives to extremist ideological feminism and the anti-feminist traditionalism.” That’s the equivalent of believing that women can be only a little bit pregnant and mostly a virgin. To not know the fundamental gender differences between the sexes IS extremist.

If any of you decide to buy and read Ms. Pierce’s book, I would appreciate receiving your comments.

There are no single parent families. Men make families and all other societal groupings. Without a man, raising children is a hardship—a hardship on the mother, society, and the children.

Only a day or two after reading the story about the 11 year-old girl sexual predator in England I saw a CNN report that eight middle school children have been expelled from their school in South Carolina for having sex while on a field trip to Washington, DC.

The chaperones made one visit to their quarters in the evening and said there would make a second by 12AM. Since they did not show up for the second visit, five children went out on the prowl looking for sex. They were girls, and they found a room with five boys and had a middle school orgy.

Chalk-up a great victory for the purveyors of sluthood in our education system who have taught children that there is no right or wrong, only choices. They have taught that the authority of parents and church are meaningless, and that “rights” carry no responsibility of self-restraint.

After attending our public education system and having been taught things deviant, given unmonitored access to material that was once rated-R, and exposed to sexually graphic music blaring through the government controlled public airwaves 24/7, on what basis were 8 of the 10 students expelled?

After being fully indoctrinated into the public policy of permissiveness, I am sure that the hypocrisy shown to them by their expulsion makes those children in South Carolina wonder why they are being punished for emulating the leader of our government, or following knowledge given to them by the sexual and media education of the school system.

Education used to be about discipline and cultivating good thinking habits. From what I have seen of my own education which endorsed pornography in the most subtle manner, it is clear that academia has lead our children away from discipline and down a path to sluthood.

Education was supposed to help people properly exercise freedom, which was always about possessing the ability to do the right thing, not just anything. With the elimination of moral absolutes, there is no right thing and there is no wrong thing.

The expulsion of these children from school is inconsistent with all of the messages of permissiveness taught to them. The tacit approval of the debauching of this society by the government and media has taught them that right and wrong are capriciously determined by power and authority, not a formula of goodness and morality.

Their actions were consistent with their education and lack of moral training.

Misfit

The European psyche believes in unbridled freedom, self-indulgence, material acquisition, and a self-important nature that results in aristocratic societal structures. These are feminine characteristics, which when in balance with masculine characteristics become attributes, but when left unchecked lead to moral decadence, chaos, and a strong central government controlled by an aristocratic elite. We have such a government now, and for the most part that has been the nature of the governments of the West for the past 2,500 years.

We have moral decadence on a scale that encompasses every facet of society, and every profession including the government itself. Well-paid heads of large corporations embezzle billions; employee theft amounts to more than a billion dollars a week, and consumer theft known as shrink, amounts to one and a half percent of retail costs. Officials in sports, business and the professions accept bribes, as do members of government who legislate and enforce the law.

Marital infidelity and divorce run rampant among the populace and clergy as well. Children spend inordinate amounts of time in nurseries and after-school care, in orphanages or foster care. Elders are put in senior citizen homes. Young people live separately or cohabitate without marriage. The majority of adults are now single. Family—the prime source of values and character building—has been destroyed and right and wrong have been supplanted by legal and illegal.

Religion has taken precedence over spirituality. Church dogma supplants spiritual understanding and religious history (a record of the seen) takes precedence over the unseen meaning of scripture.

The Western insatiable desire to accumulate things governs all its motivations and its relations with others from individuals to nations. People go to school, to get an education, get a job, make money, and be somebody. They do not go to school to learn; instead they go to acquire information that will enable them to amass material things. At the national level government measures societal well-being in terms of gross domestic product—a barometer of how much consumable material the nation produces.

The Western psyche’s desire for material accumulation results in the need to “own” everything, and land consists of that which it can own. Wherever Western man has traveled internationally he received friendly greetings from the local inhabitants who contributed to his survival. He received this hospitable treatment form the indigenous peoples of North and South America, Africa, the Middle East and the Far East. In all instances of this hospitality, Western man took ownership of the lands of his hosts and made the people slaves, serfs, and indentured servants.

The Maoris in Hawaii exist at the bottom of the American economic ladder. In South America the indigenous people are referred to as those “Indians” and have little influence in the operation of their governments or economies. In North America those “Indians” live on reservations. The tribal ways of the African have for the most part been destroyed and Western interests control the land. Western man has divided Asia into two economic environments of his design—communism and capitalism—both of which have destroyed the cultural and social structure of their lands in the process of opening them up for economic exploitation. The destruction of cultural and religious practices in the lands he occupies results from the aristocratic aspect of the Western psyche and led to the segregation of non-Westerners all over the world.

In his insatiable desire to own anything and everything, Western man has destroyed and polluted the environment to a degree unheard of in all of recorded history. He has polluted the air he breathes, the water he drinks, the food he eats, and the thoughts he thinks; and considers this pollution the price of economic well-being. He shows an open willingness to sacrifice health for money.

This sacrifice of health has caused illness of epidemic proportions. The extensive use of prescription medications to treat these symptoms has caused economic hardship on the populace and is creating strains on the federal health care budget.

When Western man points with pride to his achievements, he does not realize that they consist merely of the rearrangement of the earth’s material done at the price of disrupting natural harmony. The continuous deterioration of all that he created requires continual maintenance.

The gross materialistic thinking of Western man has so blinded him to the natural functioning of the universe that he does not know how to live in harmony with it. His society crumbles before his very eyes, and he knows not why.

Western man does not realize his responsibility regarding the propagation and preservation of the species, an activity that cannot be accomplished outside of the patriarchal structure, which in turn requires a clear understanding of the principle of gender. Instead of assuming the responsibility for the well-being of the race he turned that function over to the government while he pursued material gain. A patriarchal structure never developed in Europe; the non-sustainable nature of the nuclear family established in its place requires government intervention to maintain it. Old age homes, orphanages, and prisons are the norm of Western societies. The institutionalized care of human beings has become a major European export.

By every mental, physical, and spiritual measure Western society is crumbling. In order for people to improve their lives under these conditions it is necessary to live outside of the system. The mission statement of Men’s Action to Rebuild Society calls for the fostering of a more natural way of life. The establishment of a patriarchal societal structure serves as the primary step in that direction.

The sermons of Rev. Jeremiah Wright created media frenzy and they referred to his preaching as “hate speech.” Political commentators and talk show hosts blanketed the airwaves with what they referred to as the dangerous and divisive talk of this African-American preacher.

On the other hand, the remarks of Rev. Parsley calling Islam “anti-Christ” and Mohammed “the mouthpiece of a conspiracy of spiritual evil;” and the remarks of Rev. Hagee referring to the Roman Catholic Church as “the great whore of Babylon” and a “cult,” calling it an apostate church and stating that this false religious system will be totally devoured by the anti-Christ, received relatively little attention.

The comments of Reverend’s Parsley and Hagee sounded like hate speech to me. They publicly condemned other religions in inflammatory and insensitive terms. Rev. Wright on the other hand didn’t say that his religion was better than others or that other religions were wrong. He complained about the socio-economic condition of African-Americans, which for the most part I agreed with.

Rev.’s Parsley and Hagee did not receive much condemnation, for it is not unique for Western man to consider his views to be right and everybody else’s to be wrong, but rather his normal modus operandi. As chief of Men’s Action I receive comments from Catholics, Protestants, constitutionalists, libertarians and others telling me that me that everyone else is wrong and if their belief system were implemented the nation would return to normalcy. Western man not only knows best, but also knows that he is best. The behavior then of Rev.s Parsley and Hagee might be a little irritating to the Western psyche, but not worthy of national condemnation.

Rev. Wright’s comments on the other hand were inexcusable for he had the temerity to challenge the status quo of Western society. How dare he even think to do such a thing?
He forgot his place, which is subservience to the Western oligarchy. He had to be brought up short and reminded of who he is and isn’t, and the media did that. And to support its efforts the media dug through its supply of black honkies whom it could call upon to make remarks condemning Rev. Wright.

Why must every African-American man speak up against some other African-American who makes inflammatory statements? Immediately after such an occurrence the media wants a response form the “black community.” It does not call upon a response from the “white community” or “the Jewish community” when one of their members makes inflammatory statements.

The only way to be totally accepted in this nation is to fully adopt Western values and denounce one’s cultural heritage. The Obama’s have traveled part of the way. They have gone to the accepted elite schools, adopted big government philosophy, and behave in an appropriate manner. If they can fully renounce their cultural and religious values they will be accepted.

Reverend Wright understands this.

A change has occurred to the “woman as victim, man a perpetrator” television scenarios that have dominated programming for many years. This season I have been shocked to see programs depicting more men as victims of vindictive and falsely accusing women.

A recent program ran an installment where an accused (male) child is defended by a female defense attorney who argues he is mentally defective because of his exposure to pornography and the overall sexualization of children by this polluted culture of permissive media.

The defense attorney even brought up the girls being dressed as sluts and whores, or are wearing T-shirts that say ‘Hustler’ on them.

Has this fictional story now raised the awareness in the minds of the people (actually the reporting staffs of the media) to the slutification of our girls, and the predatorization (yes, I made up this word, we will need it as we will be seeing more of this) of our boys? .
From the stories from England and South Carolina written about previously, it appears clear that girls can be predators. They are products of modern American education that teach there is no right or wrong, or personal restraint.

Entertainment finally addresses the situation of boys sent to school where girls dress in the slut fashion of the day and wear ‘Hustler’ T-Shirts, and then go home where mom and dad are still at work, and they have unmonitored time to access all things sexual and deviant. The script pointed out that the government controlled airwaves blast “music” of everything sexual and lurid that can be recorded. Yet, there was no address of the tacit endorsement and exposure of pornography in the media shown to children that leeched into the education system of America in the 1980’s. I was there. I saw it.

The media might be recognizing that they have inextricably altered the moral content of Western civilization to the point that there is little shelter for those who would like the choice of virtue and decency in their world.

The programming beamed to young and impressionable minds that can create predators of children who are without discipline, self-restraint, and an understanding of consequences, are carried to us in the marketplace of ideas under the guise of “freedom.”

This is a fallacy and a ruse, for freedom can only be about possessing the right to do the right thing, not just anything.

Doing just anything is permissiveness, which has no moral absolutes, no right thing wrong thing; only choices.

When children are taught in a feminine permissive environment they cannot understand consequences. They cannot practice self-restraint and discipline that they have never been taught. They cannot distinguish good from bad beyond the mere power of the authority defining good and bad and issuing a punishment.

Businesses these days cannot find workers in America, because the work force is undisciplined, lie, cheat, steal, and is generally bawdy in nature—a condition blamed on what educational establishment has produced.

The schools complain that the children are undisciplined, lie, cheat, steal, and do not administer corporal punishment. Teachers cannot enforce discipline because they teach there is no right/good or wrong/bad behavior. Still they complain about lack of discipline.

Parents are in fear for their lives for disciplining their children who have been taught at the school how to call the police and file an abuse complaint if they do not get what they want, or have to endure a parental effort of discipline.

Freedom cannot exist without discipline, self-restraint, and responsibility. The wheels of commerce are grinding to a halt because of lack of disciplined and committed workers, the earnings of the porn industry grow ever larger, and more men are in prison in America than anywhere else.

America has been the victim of the “War of Feminine Permissiveness,” because it abandoned the moral, personal restraint of patriarchy—the natural learning ground of human behavior.

Misfit.

In the hoopla of recent headlines regarding Miley Cyrus, and the video of the discussion on Showbiz Tonight on CNN, the voice of reason has come out of the morass of the featured disjointed commentary.

To my amazement, the featured panelists on Showbiz Tonight presented a rare voice of reason by stating that “the adults failed…” and that 15 year-old Miley could have said “No, not yet…” to the requests of the acclaimed photographer’s request to stage the suggestive photograph.

These two women have pegged Miley’s issue and the situation of our nation. Adults not drawing the line have resulted in the sexualization of our children as well as making sex an icon of our society.

It is a crime that there was no man on the program to provide a Fatherly opinion. But we all know that Men are either religious zealots or rapists in the eyes of media and academic culture.

Do these comments of women suggest that the winds are changing since the last Disney starlet received breast implants at the age of 17?

Marketing at the allegedly wholesome Disney Corporation led the prior groomed starlets Britney Spears and Christina Aguilera down paths of indisputable degeneracy. Spears and her horrible choices (tongue kissing Madonna on MTV), and Aguilera and her naked pregnancy poses in and on the cover of a magazine that asks if she is still “Dirty.”

Miley’s predecessors have answered the question as ‘Yes, we are still dirty after we graduated from innocence at Disney to whoredom in the broader world. Just like Madonna went from ‘virgin’ image immediately to ‘slut’. Meanwhile, we in broader society have to live with being inundated by this garbage, even if we do change the channel.

Is there anything wholesome and lovely left of our humanity for our little children to inherit?

Certainly not within the confines of the media that have inundated us with this perverse culture. We have allowed our pre-teen daughters to be sold the message in teen and glamour magazines, that to be grown up is to be a slut.

We are coerced into buying clothing that results in our daughters being dressed as bawdy women in the slut fashion of the day, and at the same time we parents are expected to teach them morals by drawing the line and telling them not to act as they are dressed.

Now more than ever, society has clearly made parents up to be great hypocrites in the eyes of their children, and adults just cannot see it.

Miley’s case may give us a voice though. For women have made the point of asking the question, ” …is this an appropriate public photograph for a 15 year-old?”, as the question coming from the mouths of women might indicate that like France’s turn about against its addiction to nudes and lurid advertisement, our nation may have had enough.

It may now be time that men can ask, ‘What message is being sent to 15 year-old boys, who have been the target to the exposed teacher sex rampage in the schools, by the permissive messages of our media?’ without being called names and devalued.

We all know the pressure on the young is extreme, even without inducements and messages from the Media and the impulse loosing effects of alcohol and drugs. So then, our message as fathers and Rebuilders of Society is an important balancing act to moderate a society which, if indeed free in any capacity, will always have the loose women and philandering men, but, if it is to survive by the creation of personal affinity between the personalities of individual men and women, will never place the images of sluts on the pedestal and pillar positions as builders and centers of society.

As men, who want good, wholesome, romantic, and feminine women for our own lives, families, and sons, watch this contrived controversy unfold, what will we say to our girls about the unbridled narcissism of our culture, and the naked sexualization of children?

What will we say to our boys who are assaulted with images to make them feel inferior and undeserving?

What will we say to make some effort at having something true, good, and wholesome in our lives, and give to the world in the form of our responsible, self-controlled, accomplished, self-respecting, and mature children?

The media and the women who run the women’s and teen girl magazines are not doing the job of preserving and nurturing any true and wholesome core of our society. They are being well paid to do precisely the opposite.

Will you as a Man dare to resist the power? Will you speak up and oppose this War waged against the nature and self-seem of our children?

Misfit