Category Archives: Message From Elder George

WOMEN IN GOVERNMENT PART I

The last four essays established the premise for the recitorial society, related it to the educational system, the social welfare system, and women’s entrepreneurial activity. This essay will address women in government at the highest levels.

Probably the most well-known woman Head of State was Indira Gandhi, who as India’s third Prime Minister ruled over a nation of more than one billion people. Her father Pandit Nehru served as India’s first PM and was closely associated with Mahatma Gandhi, both activities adding to the charisma of the Gandhi and Nehru names and their influence.

Corazon Aquino of the Philippines, the first woman Asian President, was also well-known in America because of its ties to her country for more than a century. Her husband, Senator Benigno Aquino, the leader of the opposition to President Ferdinand Marcos, had been assassinated.

Sirimavo Bandaranaike served as Prime Minister of Sri Lanka. Her husband who also had been PM was assassinated while in office.

Khaleda Zia served as Prime Minister of Bangladesh. She was the widow of President Ziahur Rhaman, who had been assassinated while in office.

Another well known Asian Head of State was Benazir Bhutto, whose father Zulfikar Ali Bhutto had been Prime Minister of Pakistan

These women Heads of State had various levels of popularity, notoriety, success and failure, probably not more nor less than their male counterparts. The one factor they all had in common was a kinship with some man who had been prominent in government and/or society. Not one of these women had a political career in her own right.

Some will argue that Asian women had it more difficult than Western women to enter and succeed in politics, and that family ties helped to give entrance to women in politics; whereas, in Western countries such as England these ties are not necessary as evidenced by the political success of Margaret Thatcher.

Great attention has been given to Mrs. Thatcher’s achievement as the first woman Prime Minister of England. She earned the reputation as the Iron Lady. How much attention or understanding will be given to the fact that she failed because as a woman she pushed through the restraints on her conduct?  Women, not knowing propriety, require behavioral parameters drawn by husbands, societal mores, religious practice, legal restrictions, corporate standards, or political practice. The removal or disregard of these restraints results in their downfall as is evidenced by almost daily media coverage depicting the deteriorating conduct of women in all levels of society when  their behavioral parameters are removed; having the most powerful position in government does not provide an exemption.

Margaret Thatcher was quoted as saying, “I don’t mind how much my ministers talk, as long as they do what I say.” She thought she was better than the party that gave her political opportunity and stepped out of the normally expected parameters of her relationship with it; they ousted her because of her arrogance.

Her party was in power at the time of her ouster. To draw an American analogy to what happened to PM Thatcher, it would be similar to the Democrats having a caucus and publicly censuring President Obama while still in office. These actions are just not done. Margaret Thatcher’s career came to an end not because of the opposition party, but because of dissatisfaction by her own party.

Margaret Thatcher got too big for her bloomers.

Also, not only did all Asian women Heads of State have a kinship with some man, (father, husband, or brother) who had been prominent in government and/or society, but most women Heads of State have a similar relationships. Who is familiar with Margaret Robbins? When she married Denis Thatcher the road to Head of State began. Already a wealthy man, paying for her legal education that enabled her to become a barrister, buying a home in a neighborhood where she met people of substance and influence, having a name that opened doors that might have been shut to her, sitting on the boards of various corporations, eventually being crowned with the title Baronet, his position helped to enable his wife to become the first woman Prime Minister of England.

Are there any exceptions on the American political scene?

Some are predicting that a woman by the name of Hillary will run for President in 2016.

What is her last name?

E.G.

THE RECITORIAL SOCIETY

Education

The last two essays indirectly referred to the educational system; I will now go into greater detail in addressing the efficacy of a college education.

The goal of basic education is to enable people to read, write, count, think, and express themselves properly, and should be accomplished by high school graduation at the latest. Unfortunately this goal is rarely attained in most communities, forcing colleges to increasingly function as remedial facilities, while bestowing upon its graduates degrees implying proficiency in a given field.

Upon meeting a young woman on a New York City subway she indicated that she graduated from a New York college with a Bachelor’s degree in English. When I asked her if she had read Dante, Boccaccio, Rabelais, Chaucer, Dostoevsky, and Zola, her response was “Who are they?” I explained that they were some of the greatest writers in the Western world. I asked if she had read Walt Whitman and her response was “Who’s he?” I explained that he is considered to be one of the greatest American poets. She asked me what he wrote and I informed her that a compilation of his poems was put together in Leaves of Grass. She responded with, “I never heard of it.”

In all fairness to her, not all English majors have an extensive knowledge of literature, many of them focus instead on writing, grammar, vocabulary and usage, which led me to the main reason that I was speaking to her. I frequently illustrate that women think in pictures and speak in nouns and adjectives, whereas, men think in concepts and speak in verbs and adverbs. Unfortunately I could not make the point because she didn’t know a verb from an adjective.

This young woman was undaunted by the conversation and informed me that she would probably go back to school to get a Master’s in psychology. The tragedy of our educational system is that she probably will.

Not only will she most likely get an advanced degree but operating in our recitorial credentialized society she might end up with authority over teachers specializing in children with learning disabilities in English.

The educational system turns out high school graduates that do not know a verb from a noun, and colleges in turn graduate them without having taught them the difference while somehow with a straight face certifying that they warrant a degree.

A test given to high school graduates in America 60 years ago and then given to college seniors 50 years later, resulted in the college seniors not doing as well as the high school graduates 50 years earlier. In practical terms, this means if you are a college student, your grandmothers and great-grandmothers who graduated from high school know more than you do. I went to school with your grandmothers and great-grandmothers and can assure you that they know more than you. They also can darn a sock and dress a chicken.

This bit of information does not faze college women because they do not go to school to learn. As said earlier, everything a woman does is to excel at what is expected of her. Today she is expected to get a college degree. It does not matter that she is not learning anything other than to do the reciting necessary to fulfill that requirement; our credentialized society will provide her an employment opportunity based on the credential indicating her recitorial skill. That is the current premise for her going to college; however, fulfilling that premise has become increasingly difficult.

At the beginning of this essay I indicated that the goal of education should be completed by high school graduation. Most learning after that is vocational in nature. How much vocational training do we need? Nearly half of employed college graduates in the United States hold down jobs that don’t require a four-year college education – including 323,000 waiters and waitresses, 116,000 janitors and cleaners, and 83,000 bartenders.

A report from the nonprofit Center for College Affordability and Productivity discloses that 37 percent of employed college graduates are in jobs requiring no more than a high-school diploma, and 11 percent are in occupations requiring more than a high-school diploma but less than a bachelor’s degree.

About five million college graduates are in jobs that the Bureau of Labor Statistics says don’t even require a high-school education.

Women, enticed out of the home, removed from the skills that the home provided, motivated to attend college where little is learned, saddled with the debt of educational costs, turned loose on a declining market for what little skills they had, become wards of the state—the primary reason for the entire process.

The vocation of women for millennia has been to bring forth life and to nurture it. The vocation of men has been to provide the environment and means for women to do that as we all grow spiritually. These activities are no longer held in high esteem. Making money has top priority now.  That’s called whoredom; prophets from the first book of the Bible to the last have railed against individual whoredom and national whoredom, pointing out that focus on the material world inhibits spiritual growth.

The recitorial society does not recognize the unseen world, and can only deal with what it sees such as symptoms and effects. We have shown that moral behavior comes from unseen ethics, and the vocations of nutrition, social work, and the law–all based on what is seen—are ineffective in serving the physical and moral well-being of society.

The next recitorial society essay will address the entrepreneurial activities of women as they leave the supposed drudgery of homemaking

E.G.

Having started to write an essay entitled The Recitorial Society (I plan to coin the word recitorial) and reaching 2,500 words with no end in sight it became evident that I had already amassed sufficient material to support the makings of a book, which I just might decide to write within the year, depending on the scope of the activities of Men’s Action.

In bringing this to your attention it is not to share my self-indulgent writing, but to alert you to the nature of what is happening in society and the steps you can take to avoid its many pitfalls.

Western thinking established the genderless society, and it has devolved into a recitorial society in which all communication has been reduced to recitations, a condition affecting every facet of our lives including, education, employment, communications, health, interpersonal relations, and family.
Perhaps I will present a continuing series of the Recitorial Society, or, I might just make references to it from time to time; whatever the approach, the objective is to increase your awareness of the recitorial nature of society so that you can make changes to your lifestyle and environment.

Those in authority, in order to encourage participation by the general populace in the recitation of accumulated data, dispense awards such as certificates, licenses, and degrees, indicating the proficiency of memorization and recitation of the individual receiving the award. These awards have within them subdivisions further delineating the recitorial proficiency of the recipient.

Women love to recite because they know instinctively all information comes from outside of themselves; therefore a recitation serves as a public statement of what they know (or think they know); furthermore, receiving awards caters to the “ME” aspect of their natures.

Receptive and accommodating by nature, and measuring their self-worth by performing in accordance with what is expected of them, women will do their utmost to comply with standards they have been motivated, trained, or forced to accept. They are well motivated to obtain certificates, licenses, and degrees, which in the recitorial system is considered evidence of ability (a completely erroneous consideration), and in the credentialized structure of society it serves as a vehicle for salary determination and positions of authority.

In examining the recitorial effect on society, various vocations will be addressed, the first being nutrition.

If an organization wanted to upgrade its member’s knowledge regarding eating healthier foods it would most likely call upon a nutritionist or dietitian (most likely a woman with a master’s degree) to address the group. Why call upon a nutritionist to learn about healthy eating? If you wanted to learn how to fly a plane wouldn’t you go to a pilot, someone who could fly one? You wouldn’t go to someone who had a master’s degree in aeronautical engineering but never sat behind the controls of a plane.

Using the same reasoning, if you wanted to have a healthy body derived from the foods that you eat wouldn’t you go to a healthy person—preferably one who was old and healthy—which would give evidence that their diet maintained them in good health for many years? Ethnic cooking developed from those considerations; the elders of society knew which foods maintained healthy bodies and incorporated those foods into a traditional diet, modified in accordance with the food available. What would a 25 year-old woman with a master’s in nutrition know about healthy eating? She could only recite, but she could not give evidence of the result of eating the diet she would recommend. Nevertheless, she would have the awards, which in our credentialized society would give her the right and salary rewards to lecture to people on nutrition, whether or not she herself was healthy.

This reminds me of a caption I read of a World Health Organization worker sent to a remote area of Malaysia to teach the people proper dental hygiene. As she taught them how to use a tooth brush properly it was observed that the only person in the group missing teeth was the health care worker. She was credentialized and authorized to promote dental care while she herself was missing teeth.

Getting back to nutrition, I will state four fundamentals that apply to most things relating to the care of the race:
1. God made food. Man made junk food. Eat the food that God made; most likely you will become healthy. Eat the food that man made; most likely you will become unhealthy. That covers all the knowledge about nutrition that the recitorial teachings in our universities can possibly offer.
2. The adulteration of the food that God created by chemical additives and various forms of processing has reduced the energy levels in it. Praying over food will restore the energy to its intended level.
3. For balanced nutritional menu planning consult your grandmothers, preferably your great-grandmothers as the food they prepared made it possible for you to be here. They did it without attending any credentialized recitorial programs.
4. There are no such things as vitamins, anti-oxidants, free radicals, etc. All those things are made up and have no more validity that the Arctic Circle or International Dateline. They do not exist.
5. The above fundamentals come from a man with impeccable credentials; he is 83 years-old and does not take any medications. Do any professors in the field of nutrition, dietetics, and general health care have those credentials?

This essay illustrates one of a multitude of areas where recitorial training tends to remove any conceptual understanding of the basic necessities of life and how to obtain them.

In the next essay I will refer to social work and the law, two fields that have usurped our natural ability to care for our fellow man and establish the ethics necessary for a stable environment.

As, always, your comments would be appreciated. E.G.

School Shootings

The massacre at Sandy Hook Elementary School will invigorate the legislative efforts of gun control enthusiasts and legal activists as the limited myopic view of Western thought focuses on effects but neglects to explore the causes.

To put the slayings at Columbine, Virginia Tech, Aurora, and Sandy Hook in another perspective I reflect on the socio-economic conditions of my childhood, born a couple months after the Great Depression began, raised in a poor ethnic  neighborhood at a time of great unemployment and with few laws as compared to today, organized crime flourishing, an absence of surveillance cameras or security guards at the schools, no restrictions on the purchase of hand guns or hunting rifles, and no massacres in the school system or any other institutions.

The conditions of my youth comprise the mainstay of arguments for gun control activists: insufficient security, lack of punitive laws, poverty, and availability of firearms. Why, with all these conditions existing in the 1930’s did we not have violence in our institutions? Why was the incarceration rate a fraction of what it is today?  What was different?

There were two basic differences emanating from one fundamental source.

The children of the 1930’s were raised in safe and secure homes, feeling a sense of belonging, of being loved and nurtured, knowing that no matter what problems may arise mom and dad were there to cope with things. More than mom and dad there were other family members, aunts and uncles, cousins, and maybe grandparents, who would provide solace, advice, and security. In the absence of family there were close neighbors who were respected and who had a sense of responsibility for children.

These children also received training in moral values and consideration for others. They were taught to be respectful, obedient, courteous, considerate, responsible, reliable, and trustworthy, to name but a few of many characteristics necessary for the well-being of the family, tribe, and race.

These two basic differences—being nurtured and taught moral values—emanate from the family environment. Women bring life into the world and nurture it; men provide the means and environment for that activity to take place as all members proceed on their spiritual journey.

The family has been destroyed in the Western world and along with it the source of values conducive for safe and secure environments necessary for the proper functioning and development of its inhabitants.

The youth that commit these crimes are lonely, insecure, unfocused, confused, and suffer from angst. They have not been adequately nurtured or guided. Government cannot effectively replace family and laws cannot effectively replace ethics.

Ethics come from men who realize their responsibility is to provide the environment and means for women to bring forth life and nurture it as humankind progress on its spiritual journey. Ethics do not come from anywhere else.

I had ended this essay at this point and sent it to various people whom I thought it would interest; however, the frenzy of grossly materialistic solutions being offered by Western thought and disseminated by the media has motivated me to briefly address these solutions.

One the one hand the liberal feminine approach calls for more security measures and laws to provide the safe and secure environment that women need to function in. On the other hand the conservative masculine approach (within the feminine Western psyche) calls for having more hand guns, even supplying them to teachers so they can defend themselves. Both sides dealing with what can be seen (the Western feminine materialistic approach) and neither side addressing the unseen—ethics and the moral behavior that results from ethical standards.

A third influence consists of religious zealots, regardless of their denomination, who use their spiritual texts as rule books instead of as spiritual training guides, their objective being to control the behavior of people rather than to enlighten them and motivate them to a higher standard of spiritual living.

We send drones blowing up people all over the world (most of the victims innocent non-combatants), brag about killing top leaders of those who oppose us and televise the actual happening, provide video games focusing on blowing up people, promote professional contact sports that mutilate its participants, and consider it progress for women when they can engage in boxing and wrestling, damaging and mutating bodies designed to carry the future of the race.

We have created the conditions for the massacre in our schools. No institution is safe. Psalm 9 states: nations have plunged into a pit of their own making……the wicked man is trapped in his own devices.

We have taken men out of the home, destroyed the family, created an immoral materialistic state whose subjects consider it to be omnipotent, omnipresent, and omniscient; and love it that way. Unfortunately for them the God of materialism is imploding.

When the government has completely collapsed society will do what Isaiah had forecast: we will rebuild on the old foundations.

E.G.

As the greatest battle of recorded history enters its most expansive stage, we have all been drawn in as participants, willingly or unwillingly, aware and unaware, our lives in a process of tremendous change and upheaval as the forces of gross materialism attack the foundations of spirituality and the natural way of life that we were ordained to live.

To survive the raging battle requires knowing a power created this universe, provided the principle of gender so it could function, ordained family as the focal point of humankind, established the patriarchal structure necessary to support the family, and designed a harmoniously functioning mother nature to provide for our every need.

Live simply my sons and daughters; love God and be kind. It is written that the meek shall inherit the earth. They always do. Be patient as the battle expands and know with utmost certainty that the forces of materialism cannot prevail.

E.G.

In my last essay, The Sally Ride Legacy, I pointed out that society now accepts women having mastectomies as part of the price of becoming a CEO or attaining other highly financially rewarding positions. Another recent case is that of Kathleen Mason, CEO of Tuesday Morning who is suing her former company claiming she was fired because of her breast cancer. The majority of female CEO’s do get fired; however, the focus on this essay is not on female competence but on the price paid for this supposed competence, which is a mutation of their natural body functions.

This mutation now plays out on the other end of the age spectrum in children’s sports, which can be clearly seen in the current Olympic competition. Gabby Douglas at the age of 16 became the first American woman’s gymnastic gold medalist. She has a pretty face and a pleasing personality; she also has shoulders broader than her hips and no tits. Ye Shiwen the Chinese swimmer who set an amazing record and who was investigated as a possible performance enhancing drug user, explained that she worked out 2 ½ hours every morning and 2 ½ hours every afternoon; that’s five hours a day of grueling physical abuse that mutated her body. She, like Gabby is broader at the shoulders than at the hips and has no tits; I wonder if either one of them has experienced menses.

The motivation for this mutation of the species is Money!

We now have a society in which mothers can literally say to their daughters, “Mommy is going to make a few million dollars next year but she’s getting her tits chopped off next month.” Or teen-age daughters can say,“Mommy, I have no tits but I’m going to make a few million dollars next year.”

Besides being a societal sickness, this mutation for money also represents the activities of a whore society. Pedaling one’s ass for a buck is whoredom. We live in a whore society. All activity and performance is measured by the level of income generated; physical, mental, and spiritual tolls exacted in the attainment of this income are not addressed. It seems as though the greater the mutation of the body, the greater the material reward.

I am reminded of the Asiatic conqueror Tamerlane who when embarking on one of his military expeditions told his minister that there were too many beggars on the streets of Samarkand, and that he wanted this condition remedied by the time he returned. The minister instituted severe disciplinary measures to reduce the number of beggars but with minimal results; the minister then started to chop off the hands or feet of the beggars in his attempt to remove them from the streets. The result of this aggressive campaign was that beggars whose limbs had not been cut off complained that the beggars whose hands and feet were cut off—those that had been mutated—were earning more money.

So it is in modern Western society, the greater the mutation the more money it seems to produce or conversely, the greater the material accomplishment, the greater the mutation. To be precise, the greater the abuse of the feminine body, mind, and psyche, the greater the resulting mutation regardless of the financial outcome.

In most indigenous societies the goddess of fertility was worshiped in gratitude for the fertility of their women. Sometimes young virgins were sacrificed at the altar of the fertility goddess in the hope of ensuring the propagation of future generations. All indigenous societies understood the basic purpose of human existence was to propagate and preserve the species while on its journey of spiritual growth.

Western society also sacrifices its young women, not on occasion but constantly and in ever growing numbers, not to the goddess of fertility, but to the bitch goddess of whoredom, not for the purpose of propagating the species, but for the purpose of material gain and self-aggrandizement.

All young women are subject to mutation today, beginning with school sports programs, and continuing to participation in “health clubs.”However the greatest mutation consists of putting them in management positions in business and in government, situations that they are not suited for by nature, resulting in stress that creates hormonal imbalances, which in turn creates various deleterious effects on the female physiology such as dysmenorrheal, fibroids, cervical cancers, frigidity, infertility, unnatural child birth, inability to lactate, and the inability to give warm loving care to their children. In addition to the negative environment causing malfunction and dysfunction of the female body, mind, and psyche, we can add the effects of putting chemicals into a woman’s body to disrupt its natural function of producing a child. This is all madness.

Have women complained about this madness? No! Their adaptable and receptive natures have them believing the propaganda that they are benefiting from this mutation of their bodies, that they have been liberated (from what?), become independent (from whom?), and can now do their own thing (such as what?). Every woman knows that women do not make things better for other women, they rely on a source outside of themselves for their well-being, and the outside source designed to care for them is known as man. Men have now been replaced by a government controlled by ungodly financial interests, resulting in the mental, physical, and spiritual breakdown of women. The Tao states that without the Yang the Yin will disappear. We are witnessing the stages of disappearance of women. First, they are mutating, then they will no longer be able to reproduce, then they will disappear.

Every society in which men lost their authority degenerated into whoredom and self-indulgent values. Every society that degenerated into whoredom did not survive. Our present society is imploding. It is time to learn to live outside of it and create a new society based on a natural order of living. Only men can create that society.

Unfortunately, the men have been mutated as well; they have been neutered, emasculated, disenfranchised, and miseducated. Nevertheless, there are no alternatives to survival. The few men left that have insight as to what is happening to society and who have courage must step up to the plate and create the conditions conducive to the propagation and preservation of the species, which consists of providing the environment and means for women to bring forth life and nurture the race. It will require men of courage and action, each one performing in accordance with his ability and temperament. The time is at hand for action my sons and daughters, I’m not talking about the future—I’m talking about the now.

Men’s Action will be revamping its website shortly and will be offering specific information on the action to be taken to live outside of this imploding society and how to survive in an alternate environment. In the interim I ask that you promote this website and get as many people that you know to subscribe to it.

E.G.

On July 23, 2012 we learned that Sally Ride died. Sally was a scientist and the first American woman to travel in a space capsule; she hoped her activities would serve as an inspiration to all women.

The Christian Science Monitor wrote, “Sally Ride, a physicist, proved that women could be equal partners with men in space.” Perhaps she proved that she could learn to do what men had done first. Something else that men do that Sally Ride also did is to marry a woman. The desire on the part of modern Western women to emulate men seems to have no end or bottom, regardless of the consequences to themselves.

Riding in a space capsule cannot compare with bringing life into this world and nurturing it. Certainly our lives are much more affected by those women who gave birth to us, nurtured us, motivated us to live morally, created a loving and caring environment, and prepared us for adulthood, than by those who obtained graduate degrees, flew in space shuttles, and married other women.

The purpose of this article is not to focus on the negative effects of materially oriented goals, unnatural sex practices, and a family bereft philosophy, as bad as they are, but to address the repeated omission of comment regarding the physiological breakdown of the modern Western woman, especially those who have wealth, education, success, and fame.

The circumstances that caused me to focus on this condition occurredback in 2009 and 2010 when the news media trumpeted the affair of former Presidential candidate John Edwards and the shame of his cheating on his cancer stricken wife Elizabeth. Also the recipient of much publicity but to a lesser degree was the political activities of Carly Fiorina, former CEO of Hewlett
Packard who campaigned for a U.S. Senate seat in California.

The media attention that these women received focused on the marital environment of one and the political environment of the other. These women were educated, rich, successful, and famous. They both had double mastectomies and one died of her condition. The media never questioned why these women who had a lifestyle that denied them nothing, and access to the best medical treatment available, had their breasts chopped off. They accepted these severe maladies as part of the life of the modern American woman. You will not find one obituary on Sally Ride that will question why a highly educated, financially secure, health attended to (NASA showers its astronauts with the finest health and medical care known to them) woman, died at a relatively young age of 61 due to the complications of pancreatic cancer.

These conditions now regarded as normal—and they are for theWestern woman— are not natural. I learned last year that a majority of American woman now have fibroids, a condition of benign tumors in the womb that cause puffiness, painful and erratic menstruation. Even young women 20 years of age experience an increasing incidence of menstrual problems, such as pain in the ovaries, painful and irregular menstruation. The Western woman’s basic function
–to bring life into this world and nurture it—is being impaired because of the destruction of her physical being, especially of her reproductive organs. She has been motivated to participate in an un-natural lifestyle mentally, physically, and spiritually.

The purpose of human existence is spiritual growth and the number one activity is the propagation and preservation of the species. The act of bringing life into this world is a reenactment in microcosm of the creationof the universe. As long as we fulfill the divine purpose of increasing ourspiritual awareness (including being in tune with nature) and propagating and
preserving the species good health among women and society in general, will be the norm.

It sounds simple, but there is little acceptance of this view by a society that is grossly materialistic and questions the existence of God. Atheism is a uniquely Western philosophy and its proponents have received extensive media coverage and political influence.

The atheistic gross materialistic thought causes Western man to attempt to adjust nature, as though God did not do an adequate job. The development of seedless watermelons and cucumbers, genetically engineered seeds, hormone fed livestock, and various other aberrations of nature reflect Western man’s ignorance of the universe in which he lives. How then can he create conditions conducive to the development of the health of women since he is unaware of their prime purpose, their needs in order to fulfill this purpose, and their contribution to the human race?

Dr. Phil Valentine of the University of Kemetian Sciences refers to the Western tolerance of the demise of woman’s health as “complacent pathology.” The Western world is complacent about the destruction of the female reproductive system. One of the many traits that women have that make them desirable to men is their ability to adapt; however, without supervision they
will adapt to anything and eventually destroy themselves. A glaring example is the deterioration of their reproductive systems, which is ignored by a media that instead tells women they are liberated and now live a better life than their mothers and grandmothers… Women have adapted to their poor health and believe the propaganda describing their modern lifestyle.

Sally Ride and Carly Fiorina, never brought life into thisworld, yet they are held up as examples of what women can aspire to and attain. While the majority of women are duped into believing
their lives are getting better, their health is deteriorating and their reproductive systems are degenerating as is the condition of Western society.

E.G.

The family unit is the core of human civilization, nourishing its physical and mental needs, and providing the training grounds for its spiritual evolvement. When that core becomes weakened or destroyed humanity degenerates, mentally, physically, morally and spiritually.

The natural full-time activity of men is to sustain the family by providing the environment and the means for women to bring forth life and nurture it. This activity is not limited to the physical needs of the family, but to its mental, moral and spiritual development as well. The body must be strengthened, the mind developed, ethics instilled, and the spirit unfolded, making exercises and rituals to develop these components essential to the survival of the family.

If men devote their energies and activities to any purpose not related to the benefit of the family, it will be at the neglect of the family, and ultimately result in its detriment. When men fulfill their obligations, responsibilities, and considerations towards the family women can readily and easily nurture the race. When mother is safe and secure her milk flows easily and plentifully and her ability to transmit love becomes infinite.

Family is the core and fundamental unit of human society just as the atom is the fundamental unit of matter. The feminine electrons, rotating around the masculine nucleus, comprise the structure of the atom. Just as the atom combining with other atoms forms a molecule, the family combing with other families forms a tribe.

The atom, family, and even the solar system have the same structure; an assertive influence at the core around which the receptive entity (or entities) revolves. This natural patriarchal structure pervades the universe.

The attempt to make men and women equal in performance exhibits an ignorance of the purpose of life and a lack of understanding of the nature of gender.

Heat, light, and sound are assertive influences; cold, dark, and quiet reflect the absence of these influences. Two opposing entities cannot operate in one area of activity. If cold were an entity that opposed heat, a temperature setting could not be maintained. If darkness opposed light, a level of illumination could not be set. If quiet opposed sound, a level of sound could not be maintained. There can only be one assertive influence in any field of activity otherwise equilibrium could not be established. To disregard gender differences is un-natural, and unworkable.

Western society has lost its equilibrium, enacting un-natural laws to make men and women equal in function, necessitating the enactment of more laws in order to maintain order.

The purpose of life, is to grow spiritually while propagating and preserving the race, utilizing the unique characteristics of both genders, providing a warm and caring environment, generating a sense of belongingness, and maintaining equilibrium. Patriarchy provides the structure that enables those activities. Western society, not understanding the purpose of life, living outside of the patriarchal structure, believing in the exploitation of the earth for personal gain, making consumption its key activity, creating an aberration of natural behavior, has destroyed the natural order of things.

Family has no viable substitute.

The above could serve as an essay as it stands, and in a society that has an awareness of its purpose in life it would be understood; however, current Western society does have that awareness, consequently almost everything in it is subject to challenge, if not ridicule.

Women serving as devoted mothers, loyal wives, nurturers of the race, and comforters of the forlorn, no longer elicit admiration, but rather scorn and deprecation. In their stead we have independent women unencumbered by any requirement s of marriage, family, or responsibility to society, doing their own thing, whatever that means.

One such woman, a 30-year-old law student sat before Congress recently asking it to pay for her birth control costs because she apparently has yet to figure out her fertile period and how to control herself during it, an issue already buried by the more recent comments of one Hillary Rosen who stated on television that Amy Romney (wife of Presidential candidate Mitt Romney and mother of five) never worked a day in her life; a clear expression of the corrupted value structure instilled in a growing number of women in Western society.

These values (or lack of them) have been drilled into the minds of young women for a long time, perhaps the most newsworthy expression being the reaction to the choice of Barbara Bush to give a commencement address at Wellesley College in 1990, when more than a quarter of the student body signed a petition that she was not a good role model for career oriented women. At that time, Barbara’s husband was President of the United States, one son Governor of Texas and the other Governor of Florida. Aren’t successful husbands and children related to the influence of the homemaker? Isn’t creating a home atmosphere that produces stable, well-functioning, and dedicated offspring a major accomplishment?

Does having an education mean that a woman should no longer dedicate herself to doing her share towards propagating and preserving the species as it progresses on its spiritual journey? Does raising children belong to the lot of the uneducated woman? Is not education compatible with the rearing of children?

The conduct and activity of Thomas Edison’s mother concerning his development provides an alternative viewpoint. Early in grade school Thomas performed poorly and his schoolmaster described him as addled or slow. His mother took him out of school and read the classics to him in addition to providing some form of home schooling. He went back to school during his eighth year and left permanently in his 13th year after which he went on to become an engineering and entrepreneurial genius. He said of his mother, “My mother was the making of me. She was so true, so sure of me, and I felt I had some one to live for, some one I must not disappoint.”

If Thomas Edison were a schoolboy in today’s society he would be given Ritalin to calm him down and his mother would be motivated to enter the workforce and “be somebody.”

There is no greater accomplishment for a woman than to bring life into this world and nurture it. The race needs nurturing, and only women can do it. They can only do it in the secure and stable environment that men establish called family. All other activity in life either supports that function or is superfluous.

Family is the core of human civilization. There is no viable alternative.

E.G.